<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Westlaw Insider &#187; Headnotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://westlawinsider.com/category/headnote-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://westlawinsider.com</link>
	<description>Insights, Westlaw tips and the lighter side of legal research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Man&#8217;s Share of the Blame</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/mans-share-of-the-blame/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/mans-share-of-the-blame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=24215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where God and man collaborate in causing flood damage, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>405 Water Law</li>
<li>405V Diffuse Surface Waters</li>
<li>405V(A) In General</li>
<li>405k1168 Drainage or Discharge</li>
<li>405k1169 k. In General.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/02-03-12.jpg" alt="405 Water Law" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">Where God and man collaborate in causing flood damage, man must pay at least for his share of the blame.<br /><strong><em>Mark Downs, Inc. v. McCormick Properties, Inc., </em> 441 A.2d 1119 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1982)</strong></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 405 Water Law 405V Diffuse Surface Waters 405V(A) In General 405k1168 Drainage or Discharge 405k1169 k. In General. Where God ...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/mans-share-of-the-blame/','Man\&#8217;s Share of the Blame','Man\&#8217;s Share of the Blame via: @westlaw insider','','24215', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/mans-share-of-the-blame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Balls of&#8230;toilet paper?</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/great-balls-of-toilet-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/great-balls-of-toilet-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=24212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State presented insufficient evidence that defendant, who threw balls of wet toilet paper at correction officer, attempted to cause injury by means of a dangerous instrument to support conviction for attempted assault in the second degree; ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>37 Assault and Battery</li>
<li>37II Criminal Responsibility</li>
<li>37II(B) Prosecution</li>
<li>37k91.1 Weight and Sufficiency of Evidence</li>
<li>37k91.11 k. Attempt.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/02-02-12.jpg" alt="37 Assault and Battery" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">State presented insufficient evidence that defendant, who threw balls of wet toilet paper at correction officer, attempted to cause injury by means of a dangerous instrument to support conviction for attempted assault in the second degree; instruments consisted of compressed balls of wet toilet paper, some of which were mixed with banana, defendant threw balls from distance of 12 to 15 feet, and ball which struck officer was small enough to pass through one of the 2 1/2-inch openings in protective grate. <br /><strong><em>People v. Travis, </em> 711 N.Y.S.2d 514 (App. Div. 2000)</strong><br /><em>Suggested by Andrea Wan, Senior Court Attorney; New York Unified Court System; Brooklyn, NY</em></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 37 Assault and Battery 37II Criminal Responsibility 37II(B) Prosecution 37k91.1 Weight and Sufficiency of Evidence 37k91.11 k. ...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/great-balls-of-toilet-paper/','Great Balls of\&#8230;toilet paper?','Great Balls of\&#8230;toilet paper? via: @westlaw insider','','24212', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/great-balls-of-toilet-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary Judgment Misnomer</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/summary-judgment-misnomer/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/summary-judgment-misnomer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=24207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Term "summary judgment" is something of a misnomer; it suggests judicial process that is simple, abbreviated, and inexpensive, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>170A Federal Civil Procedure</li>
<li>170AXVII Judgment</li>
<li>170AXVII(C) Summary Judgment</li>
<li>170AXVII(C)1 In General</li>
<li>170Ak2461 k. In General.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/02-01-12.jpg" alt="170A Federal Civil Procedure" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">Term &#8220;summary judgment&#8221; is something of a misnomer; it suggests judicial process that is simple, abbreviated, and inexpensive, while in reality, process is complicated, time-consuming, and expensive.<br /><strong><em>Fesler v. Whelen Eng&#8217;g Co., Inc.,</em> 794 F. Supp. 2d 994 (S.D. Iowa 2011)</strong><br /><em>Suggested by David F. Herr, Partner and Thomson Reuters Author; Maslon Edelman Borman &amp; Brand, LLP; Minneapolis, MN</em></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 170A Federal Civil Procedure 170AXVII Judgment 170AXVII(C) Summary Judgment 170AXVII(C)1 In General 170Ak2461 k. In General. T...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/summary-judgment-misnomer/','Summary Judgment Misnomer','Summary Judgment Misnomer via: @westlaw insider','','24207', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/summary-judgment-misnomer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twin Justice</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/twin-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/twin-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=23310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since one twin was ordered by court to give handwriting samples after being arrested for using stolen credit card, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>282 Obstructing Justice</li>
<li>282k5 k. Suppression or Falsification of Evidence.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/01-31-12.jpg" alt="282 Obstructing Justice" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">Since one twin was ordered by court to give handwriting samples after being arrested for using stolen credit card, the other twin&#8217;s appearing and giving the handwriting samples was designed to prevent his brother from so doing and amounted to obstruction of justice.<br /><strong><em>Elliott v. U.S.</em>, 385 A.2d 183 (D.C. 1978)</strong><br /><em>Suggested by Kara Boucher, Principal Attorney Editor, Westlaw</em></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 282 Obstructing Justice 282k5 k. Suppression or Falsification of Evidence. Since one twin was ordered by court to give handwri...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/twin-justice/','Twin Justice','Twin Justice via: @westlaw insider','','23310', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/twin-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;&#8230;no such thing as a free lunch&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/no-such-thing-as-a-free-lunch/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/no-such-thing-as-a-free-lunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=23307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Negotiation of class counsel's attorneys' fees is not exempt from truism that ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>170A Federal Civil Procedure</li>
<li>170AXIX Fees and Costs</li>
<li>170Ak2737 Attorney Fees</li>
<li>170Ak2737.13 k. Class Actions; Settlements.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/01-30-12.jpg" alt="170A Federal Civil Procedure" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">Negotiation of class counsel&#8217;s attorneys&#8217; fees is not exempt from truism that there is no such thing as a free lunch.<br /><strong><em>Staton v. Boeing Co.</em>, 327 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2003)</strong></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 170A Federal Civil Procedure 170AXIX Fees and Costs 170Ak2737 Attorney Fees 170Ak2737.13 k. Class Actions; Settlements. Negoti...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/no-such-thing-as-a-free-lunch/','\&#8220;\&#8230;no such thing as a free lunch\&#8230;\&#8221;','\&#8220;\&#8230;no such thing as a free lunch\&#8230;\&#8221; via: @westlaw insider','','23307', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/no-such-thing-as-a-free-lunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A &#8220;well-recognized fact&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/a-well-recognized-fact/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/a-well-recognized-fact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=23303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a well-recognized fact that big persons ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>157 Evidence</li>
<li>157I Judicial Notice</li>
<li>157k14 k. Facts Relating to Human Life, Health, Habits, and Acts.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/01-27-12.jpg" alt="157 Evidence" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">It is a well-recognized fact that big persons fall harder than small ones.<br /><strong><em>Garbutt v. Schechter</em>, 334 P.2d 225 (Cal. Ct. App. 1959)</strong><br /><em>Suggested by Sara Dudley, Librarian; Severson &amp; Werson; San Francisco, CA</em></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 157 Evidence 157I Judicial Notice 157k14 k. Facts Relating to Human Life, Health, Habits, and Acts. It is a well-recognized fa...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/a-well-recognized-fact/','A \&#8220;well-recognized fact\&#8221;','A \&#8220;well-recognized fact\&#8221; via: @westlaw insider','','23303', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/a-well-recognized-fact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fictitious Claims</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/fictitious-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/fictitious-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=23299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Claims that are "essentially fictitious," thus warranting dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, include those that allege ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>170B Federal Courts</li>
<li>170BI Jurisdiction and Powers in General</li>
<li>170BI(A) In General</li>
<li>170Bk29 Objections to Jurisdiction, Determination and Waiver</li>
<li>170Bk32 k. Pleading.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/01-26-12.jpg" alt="170B Federal Courts" style="float:right;margin-left:10px"><font face="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" color="#505050" size="2">Claims that are &#8220;essentially fictitious,&#8221; thus warranting dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, include those that allege bizarre conspiracy theories, fantastic government manipulations of the will or mind, or any sort of supernatural intervention.<br /><strong><em>Bickford v. Gov&#8217;t of U.S.</em>, 2011 WL 3891805 (D.D.C. Sept. 6, 2011)</strong></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 170B Federal Courts 170BI Jurisdiction and Powers in General 170BI(A) In General 170Bk29 Objections to Jurisdiction, Determinat...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/fictitious-claims/','Fictitious Claims','Fictitious Claims via: @westlaw insider','','23299', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/fictitious-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trial Judge Comments</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/trial-judge-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/trial-judge-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=23296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comments of trial judge to defense counsel, to effect that counsel was "bordering on being a sleaze" ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>110 Criminal Law</li>
<li>110XXIV Review</li>
<li>110XXIV(Q) Harmless and Reversible Error</li>
<li>110k1166.5 Conduct of Trial in General</li>
<li>110k1166.22 Remarks and Conduct of Judge</li>
<li>110k1166.22(3) k. Argument and Conduct of Counsel, Remarks as To.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/01-25-12.jpg" alt="110 Criminal Law" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">Comments of trial judge to defense counsel, to effect that counsel was &#8220;bordering on being a sleaze&#8221; did not constitute reversible error, as they were made outside presence and hearing of jury.<br /><strong><em>Houston v. State</em>, 565 So. 2d 277 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)</strong></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 110 Criminal Law 110XXIV Review 110XXIV(Q) Harmless and Reversible Error 110k1166.5 Conduct of Trial in General 110k1166.22 Rem...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/trial-judge-comments/','Trial Judge Comments','Trial Judge Comments via: @westlaw insider','','23296', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/trial-judge-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appellate Court Burden</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/appellate-court-burden/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/appellate-court-burden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=23293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appellate court system is designed so that appellant must do the "heavy lifting," ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>30 Appeal and Error</li>
<li>30XVI Review</li>
<li>30XVI(G) Presumptions</li>
<li>30k901 k. Burden of Showing Error.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/01-24-12.jpg" alt="30 Appeal and Error" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">Appellate court system is designed so that appellant must do the &#8220;heavy lifting,&#8221; and an appellate court that assumes that burden on behalf of an appellant distorts the fundamental allocation of benefits and burdens.<br /><strong><em>Niemela v. Imperial Mfg., Inc.</em>, 263 P.3d 1191 (Utah Ct. App. Sept. 29, 2011)</strong><br /><em>Suggested by Valerie Garber, Principal Attorney Editor, Westlaw</em></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 30 Appeal and Error 30XVI Review 30XVI(G) Presumptions 30k901 k. Burden of Showing Error. Appellate court system is designed s...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/appellate-court-burden/','Appellate Court Burden','Appellate Court Burden via: @westlaw insider','','23293', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/appellate-court-burden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;&#8230;matters of common knowledge&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/matters-of-common-knowledge/</link>
		<comments>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/matters-of-common-knowledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Westlaw Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westlaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westlawinsider.com/?p=23290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court can take judicial notice of matters of common knowledge, such as fact that state of Minnesota has ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="keys" style="font-weight:bold">
<li>157 Evidence</li>
<li>157I Judicial Notice</li>
<li>157k23 Matters Relating to Government and Its Administration in General</li>
<li>157k23(1) k. In General.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://westapps.west.thomson.com/WestHeadnote/images/01-23-12.jpg" alt="157 Evidence" style="float:right;margin-left:10px">Court can take judicial notice of matters of common knowledge, such as fact that state of Minnesota has an excellent National Guard, well trained and well equipped.<br /><strong><em>Strutwear Knitting Co. v. Olson</em>, 13 F. Supp. 384 (D. Minn. 1936)</strong><br /><em>Suggested by Jeremy Feilmeyer, Westlaw Reference Attorney</em></p>
<div class="rpxsocial"><div class="rpxsharebutton" onclick="rpxWPsocial('Share:',' 157 Evidence 157I Judicial Notice 157k23 Matters Relating to Government and Its Administration in General 157k23(1) k. In Gener...','http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/matters-of-common-knowledge/','\&#8220;\&#8230;matters of common knowledge\&#8230;\&#8221;','\&#8220;\&#8230;matters of common knowledge\&#8230;\&#8221; via: @westlaw insider','','23290', this);"><div class="rpx_share_label">SHARE</div><div class="rpx_social_icons"><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_facebook" title="Facebook"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_linkedin" title="LinkedIn"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_twitter" title="Twitter"></div><div class="rpx_icon rpx_size30 rpx_yahoo" title="Yahoo!"></div></div></div> &nbsp;</div> <div class="rpx_clear"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://westlawinsider.com/headnote-of-the-day/matters-of-common-knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

