Under New Jersey law as predicted by the Court of Appeals, season ticket-holder, who alleged, inter alia, tortious interference with contract as well as cause of action under consumer fraud statute, suffered no cognizable injury to a legally protected right or interest through the acts of an opposing football team in “stealing” his team’s signals by means of surreptitious videotaping; ticket only granted its holder a contractual right to entry into the stadium and a seat from which to watch the specified game. Mayer v. Belichick, 605 F.3d 223 (3d Cir. 2010) Suggested by Robert P. Knapp III; Mulholland & Knapp, LLP; New York, NY
The Westlaw Insider blog features Westlaw and WestlawNext research tips, training opportunities and product info, as well as notable events and stories of interest to legal professionals. The blog is maintained by the eMarketing team and features insights and commentary from West’s reference attorneys, attorney-editors, key authors, and other contributing partners.
Headnotes
Legal News
Verdict of The Week
Research Tips
Social Media Law
Health Care Law
Under New Jersey law as predicted by the Court of Appeals, season ticket-holder, who alleged, inter alia, tortious interference with contract as well as cause of action under consumer fraud statute, suffered no cognizable injury to a legally protected right or interest through the acts of an opposing football team in “stealing” his team’s signals by means of surreptitious videotaping; ticket only granted its holder a contractual right to entry into the stadium and a seat from which to watch the specified game.
